Studies in Markan Priority and the Synoptic Problem
Mark Goodacre
Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2002
The standard solution to the Synoptic Problem supposes that Matthew and Luke made independent use not only of Mark but also of another source, now lost, called 'Q'. But in The Case Against Q Mark Goodacre combines a strong affirmation of Markan Priority with a careful and detailed critique of the Q hypothesis, giving fresh perspectives on the evidence drawn not only from traditional methods but also from contemporary scholarly approaches. In an invigorating and imaginative approach to one of the most important issues in New Testament scholarship, Goodacre paints a plausible picture of Synoptic interrelationships in a bid to renew discussions about Christian origins.
| All About
The Case Against Q |
Supplementary Materials
(Introductory) |
|---|---|
|
Reviews (New) |
|
| Supplementary Materials
(Articles) | |
|
Michael Goulder, "Is Q a Juggernaut?"
Edward C. Hobbs, "A Quarter Century Without Q"
Mark Goodacre, "Fatigue in the Synoptics"
Mark Goodacre, "A Monopoly on Marcan Priority? Fallacies at the Heart of Q"
|
|
The Case Against Q web site (formerly "World Without Q" and "Mark Without Q") was created in September 1997 and last revised on 5 November 2002. Those who would like to be notified when it is updated should type their Email address below:
| Search | Guestbook |
To cite this website:
Mark Goodacre, The Case Against Q web site
(latest update, November 2002)
http://NTGateway.com/Q